taskforce wrote:
Lalakoboldslayer wrote:
Just finished EXTRA Mode on Mana Khemia 2 for PS2.
I have to say that this game is much better than the first, much better story, much funnyer, and even better battle system.
Hehe, you're probably the one lone person on the planet that considers 2 better than 1

Every review I see (and my own opinion for that matter) says that the game isn't nearly as good as the first.
As for me, I just finished Mana Khemia 2. Awesome story. That battle system needs serious work though. Why they ditched the original and went with that mess? Who knows. Not the worst system ever made but made an extremely good story less fun because of it.
Well, actually no, most of the people I know in my country, that plays RPGs, think that this game is much better than the first one.
And about reviews, I'm a very long time gamer, and if there's one thing I'm really proud of, is the fact that not even once in my life I had read a review more than a paragraph. To that extent I have to add that I would be a much better reviewer than 99% of them, since I actually play the game, more than 5 minutes, before reviewing it.
Ok, let's start:
About the story, let's face it, MK sub-series is not about the story, it's about gameplay and cutesy graphics. The first one's story is pretty duhh, it doesn't make any sense, and has a very unrealistically feel. The second one's story, at least, makes sense. Most of the things that happened through both characters stories should have happened in the first place, they're very reallistic feelings and reactions, taking their personalities in consideration.
I know that you're thinking talking about reality in a fantasy story is insane, but let's now talk about LotR. If I had read in the third book, that Aragorn was facing thousands of Orcs alone, an than he suddenly cast a spell that burned every single one of them, I would tell this series is pretty bad. Why that ? Simply because Aragorn never showed any sign of being a magician, and than he shows greater magic than even Gandalf ? So, like you can see, there's a limit to what fantasy could do, before going lame.
Now, let's talk about characters. Both game's characters are pretty good. But if you're going to compare.
First MK most interesting characters: Flay and Mimi(2)
Second MK most interesting characters: Pepperoni, Chloe, Et, Lily and to an extent Flay(4.5 since Flay is not playable in this version)
2 x 4.5 = Second one wins in that comparison too.
About battle system. Overall MK sub-series has pretty good battle system, but the second one is better. I remember when playing the first MK, that I got really pissed when I finally discovered that Vayne was the only character that could do a Variable Strike, in that moment I said "that s*c*s"
I'm really glad they added Intimate Strikes to every playable character in the second game.
The first MK doesn't add much strategy about battles, just press buttons insanely and you're good to go. In the second MK, you actually have to plan your strategies before going to fight a boss. It has much more strategies involving elements, sphere skills and double up skills. And Intimate Guards give more options on battle strategy elements. One more thing is that battles not only give AP, but it raises your HP and SP too, that makes battles much more attractive than in the first game.
So, in this comparison the second MK wins again.
Now, about alchemy. Seriously, it's not even fair to compare alchemy systems between MK and MK2, the second one's so much better, it doesn't even seems like they're from the same series. But if you want to, let's start:
The first MK don't have much reason to actually raise ether levels, since it doesn't add to much on the game, but on the second alchemy it's very important. I allways thought that having alchemy in second place on a game all about alchemy is pretty lame, but let's continue. On the first one, you just synthesize, on the second, you have a lot of skills passive and active to use on synthesies. And there's actually a very good reason to raise either level on this game, to make your characters stronger, by learning the third slots in Grow Books.
So in this comparison, second MK wins again.
Well, I'll not talk about graphics and sound here, since there's not a huge difference between both games in this area, even though the second MK is a little better in both cases.
Seriously, I can't see a single reason anyone in the world would say the first MK is beter than the second.
After reading all of this, you should probably think that I hated the first MK, but that's not like that. I just feel that the second is much better, that's all.